↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological Approaches to Reducing Craving in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological Approaches to Reducing Craving in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders
Published in
CNS Drugs, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40263-014-0149-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina L. Haass-Koffler, Lorenzo Leggio, George A. Kenna

Abstract

Research on the concept of craving may lead to better understanding of the biobehavioural circuitries that contribute to the complexity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs). The experiences described as craving or desire to drink are often associated with physical responses such as increased salivation and heart rate, and alteration of stress hormones, as well as psychological responses such as anxiety and depression. Greater craving has been associated with an increased probability of alcohol relapse. Reversal of craving, which is understood as a symptom of protracted abstinence, offers the possibility of preventing relapses and treating alcoholism. Various medications have been studied to establish whether they are able to reduce craving; however, the results obtained from clinical studies have been inconsistent. Here, we review the interdisciplinary models developed to evaluate craving, then the different approaches used to assess and measure craving and, finally, the medications utilized and tested to lessen craving in patients suffering from AUDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 25%
Psychology 19 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,999,406
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#638
of 1,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,747
of 222,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.