↓ Skip to main content

A National Study of HPV Vaccination of Adolescent Girls: Rates, Predictors, and Reasons for Non-Vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
A National Study of HPV Vaccination of Adolescent Girls: Rates, Predictors, and Reasons for Non-Vaccination
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10995-012-1066-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura M. Kester, Gregory D. Zimet, J. Dennis Fortenberry, Jessica A. Kahn, Marcia L. Shew

Abstract

Despite recommendations in the U.S. for routine HPV vaccination of adolescent girls since 2006, rates of vaccination continue to be low. This study reports vaccination uptake, factors associated with vaccine uptake and reasons for non-vaccination within a national sample of adolescent females during 2010. Using a computer administered survey of a national sample of 501 mothers of daughters 14-17 years old we assessed maternal reports of HPV vaccination as well as socio-demographical factors, maternal HPV exposures and reasons chosen for non-vaccination. Reported HPV vaccination rates were slightly over 50 % (51.1 %), with 38.3 % reporting completion of all 3 doses. Socioeconomic and demographic factors were not associated with vaccination initiation; however, Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to complete vaccination. The most common reasons for non-vaccination were concerns about vaccine safety, danger to daughter, and provider non-recommendation. Relatively poor HPV vaccine initiation and only modest 3-dose completion continues to be a major public health concern that requires continued efforts to address identified predictors and reasons for non-vaccination.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Myanmar 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 183 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 29%
Social Sciences 28 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Psychology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 49 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,043,787
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#403
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,721
of 166,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.