↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs in Allergy and Asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
MicroRNAs in Allergy and Asthma
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11882-014-0424-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Rebane, Cezmi A. Akdis

Abstract

microRNAs (miRNAs) are short, single-stranded RNA molecules that function together with the partner proteins and cause degradation of target mRNAs or inhibit their translation. A particular miRNA can have hundreds of targets; therefore, miRNAs cumulatively influence the expression of a large proportion of genes. The functions of miRNAs in human diseases have been studied since their discovery in mammalian cells approximately 12 years ago. However, the role of miRNAs in allergic disease has only very recently begun to be uncovered. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the functions of miRNAs involved in the development of allergic diseases. We describe here the functions of miRNAs that regulate Th2 polarization and influence general inflammatory and tissue responses. In addition, we will highlight findings about the functions of extracellular miRNAs as possible noninvasive biomarkers of diseases with heterogeneous phenotypes and complex mechanisms and briefly discuss advances in the development of miRNA-based therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,780,011
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#542
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,934
of 308,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.