↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of waist-to-hip ratio and other obesity indices as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in people with type-2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study from ADVANCE

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of waist-to-hip ratio and other obesity indices as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in people with type-2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study from ADVANCE
Published in
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, January 2011
DOI 10.1097/hjr.0b013e32833c1aa3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien Czernichow, Andre-Pascal Kengne, Rachel R Huxley, George David Batty, Bastiaan de Galan, Diederick Grobbee, Avinesh Pillai, Sophia Zoungas, Michel Marre, Mark Woodward, Bruce Neal, John Chalmers, the ADVANCE Collaborative Group

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the strength of associations and discrimination capability of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with type-2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 19%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Other 16 9%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 50 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,172,643
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#757
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,801
of 200,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.