↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Exercise Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 2,884)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
48 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
132 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
22 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
278 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
904 Mendeley
Title
Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Exercise Performance
Published in
Sports Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0149-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew M. Jones

Abstract

Dietary nitrate is growing in popularity as a sports nutrition supplement. This article reviews the evidence base for the potential of inorganic nitrate to enhance sports and exercise performance. Inorganic nitrate is present in numerous foodstuffs and is abundant in green leafy vegetables and beetroot. Following ingestion, nitrate is converted in the body to nitrite and stored and circulated in the blood. In conditions of low oxygen availability, nitrite can be converted into nitric oxide, which is known to play a number of important roles in vascular and metabolic control. Dietary nitrate supplementation increases plasma nitrite concentration and reduces resting blood pressure. Intriguingly, nitrate supplementation also reduces the oxygen cost of submaximal exercise and can, in some circumstances, enhance exercise tolerance and performance. The mechanisms that may be responsible for these effects are reviewed and practical guidelines for safe and efficacious dietary nitrate supplementation are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 904 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 883 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 229 25%
Student > Master 144 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 9%
Researcher 50 6%
Other 48 5%
Other 143 16%
Unknown 208 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 285 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 90 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 4%
Other 77 9%
Unknown 239 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 499. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#52,308
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#35
of 2,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332
of 242,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.