| Title |
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Behavioral Inhibition: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Stop-signal Paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10802-007-9131-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Matt Alderson, Mark D. Rapport, Michael J. Kofler |
| Abstract |
Deficient behavioral inhibition (BI) processes are considered a core feature of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This meta-analytic review is the first to examine the potential influence of a wide range of subject and task variable moderator effects on BI processes--assessed by the stop-signal paradigm--in children with ADHD relative to typically developing children. Results revealed significantly slower mean reaction time (MRT), greater reaction time variability (SDRT), and slower stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) in children with ADHD relative to controls. The non-significant between-group stop-signal delay (SSD) metric, however, suggests that stop-signal reaction time differences reflect a more generalized deficit in attention/cognitive processing rather than behavioral inhibition. Several subject and task variables served as significant moderators for children's mean reaction time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 335 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 23% |
| Researcher | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 165 | 46% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,372,943
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#608
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,470
of 76,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.