↓ Skip to main content

Nutrition and the Adaptation to Endurance Training

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
114 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
Title
Nutrition and the Adaptation to Endurance Training
Published in
Sports Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0146-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith Baar

Abstract

Maximizing metabolic stress at a given level of mechanical stress can improve the adaptive response to endurance training, decrease injury, and potentially improve performance. Calcium and metabolic stress, in the form of heat, decreases in the adenosine triphosphate/adenosine diphosphate ratio, glycogen depletion, caloric restriction, and oxidative stress, are the primary determinants of the adaptation to training. These stressors increase the activity and amount of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1α), a protein that can directly induce the primary adaptive responses to endurance exercise: mitochondrial biogenesis, angiogenesis, and increases in fat oxidation. The activity of PGC-1α is regulated by its charge (phosphorylation and acetylation), whereas its transcription is regulated by proteins that bind to myocyte enhancing factor 2, enhancer box, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element sites within the PGC-1α promoter. This brief review will describe what is known about the control of PGC-1α by these metabolic stressors. As the duration of calcium release and the amount of metabolic stress, and therefore the activation of PGC-1α, can be directly modulated by training and nutrition, a simple strategy can be generated to maximize the adaptive response to endurance training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 362 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 67 17%
Student > Master 65 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 13%
Researcher 35 9%
Other 31 8%
Other 92 24%
Unknown 45 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 135 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 6%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 57 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#289,166
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#272
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,289
of 242,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#11
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.