↓ Skip to main content

Deconvolution of isotope signals from bundles of multiple hairs

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Deconvolution of isotope signals from bundles of multiple hairs
Published in
Oecologia, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2945-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher H. Remien, Frederick R. Adler, Lesley A. Chesson, Luciano O. Valenzuela, James R. Ehleringer, Thure E. Cerling

Abstract

Segmental analysis of hair has been used in diverse fields ranging from forensics to ecology to measure the concentration of substances such as drugs and isotopes. Multiple hairs are typically combined into a bundle for segmental analysis to obtain a high-resolution series of measurements. Individual hair strands cycle through multiple phases of growth and grow at different rates when in the growth phase. Variation in growth of hair strands in a bundle can cause misalignment of substance concentration between hairs, attenuating the primary body signal. We developed a mathematical model based on the known physiology of hair growth to describe the signal averaging caused by bundling multiple hairs for segmental analysis. The model was used to form an inverse method to estimate the primary body signal from measurements of a hair bundle. The inverse method was applied to a previously described stable oxygen isotope chronology from the hair of a murder victim and provides a refined interpretation of the data. Aspects of the reconstruction were confirmed when the victim was later identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 30%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,436,662
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,669
of 4,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,112
of 227,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.