↓ Skip to main content

Primary patellar dislocations without surgical stabilization or recurrence: how well are these patients really doing?

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Primary patellar dislocations without surgical stabilization or recurrence: how well are these patients really doing?
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00167-015-3716-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A. Magnussen, Megan Verlage, Elizabeth Stock, Lauren Zurek, David C. Flanigan, Marc Tompkins, Julie Agel, Elizabeth A. Arendt

Abstract

While a significant research has gone into identifying patients at highest risk of recurrence following primary patellar dislocation, there has been little work exploring the outcomes of patients who do not have a recurrent patellar dislocation. We hypothesize that patients without recurrent dislocation episodes will exhibit significantly higher KOOSs than those who suffer recurrent dislocations, but lower scores than published age-matched normative data. A retrospective review of patients with nonoperatively treated primary lateral patellar dislocations was carried out, and patients were contacted at a mean of 3.4 years (range 1.3-5.5 years) post-injury. Information regarding subsequent treatment and recurrent dislocations along with patient-reported outcome scores and activity level was collected. One hundred and eleven patients (29.8 %) of 373 eligible patients agreed to study participation, seven of whom were excluded because they underwent subsequent patellar stabilization surgery on the index knee. Seventy-six patients (73.1 %) reported no further dislocation events, and the mean KOOS subscales at follow-up were: symptoms-80.2 ± 18.8, pain-81.8 ± 16.2, ADL-88.7 ± 15.9, sport/recreation-72.1 ± 24.4, and QOL-63.9 ± 23.8 at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (range 1.3-5.5 years). No significant differences in any of the KOOS subscales were noted between these patients and the group that reported recurrent patellar dislocations. Only 26.4 % of the patients without further dislocations reported they were able to return to desired sport activities without limitations following their dislocation. Patients who do not report recurrent patellar dislocations following nonoperative treatment of primary patellar dislocations are in many cases limited by this injury 3 years following the initial dislocation event. Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 35 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,618,699
of 23,981,346 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#817
of 2,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,758
of 266,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,981,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.