↓ Skip to main content

Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy and Patient Outcomes in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal Versus Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy Study*

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy and Patient Outcomes in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal Versus Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy Study*
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Jun, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alan Cass, Martin Gallagher, Serigne Lo, Joanne Lee

Abstract

To explore the relationship between timing of continuous renal replacement therapy commencement and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 95 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 21%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 31 30%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#3,317,808
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#2,285
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,982
of 240,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#31
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.