You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A genome wide association study (GWAS) providing evidence of an association between common genetic variants and late radiotherapy toxicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiotherapy & Oncology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gillian C. Barnett, Deborah Thompson, Laura Fachal, Sarah Kerns, Chris Talbot, Rebecca M. Elliott, Leila Dorling, Charlotte E. Coles, David P. Dearnaley, Barry S. Rosenstein, Ana Vega, Paul Symonds, John Yarnold, Caroline Baynes, Kyriaki Michailidou, Joe Dennis, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Jennifer S. Wilkinson, Antonio Gómez-Caamaño, George A. Tanteles, Radka Platte, Rebecca Mayes, Don Conroy, Mel Maranian, Craig Luccarini, Sarah L. Gulliford, Matthew R. Sydes, Emma Hall, Joanne Haviland, Vivek Misra, Jennifer Titley, Søren M. Bentzen, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Neil G. Burnet, Alison M. Dunning, Catharine M.L. West |
| Abstract |
This study was designed to identify common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with toxicity 2years after radiotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,366,788
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#1,162
of 4,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,917
of 243,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.