| Title |
Feeding in Arctic darkness: mid-winter diet of the pelagic amphipods Themisto abyssorum and T. libellula
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-012-2065-8 |
| Authors |
Angelina Kraft, Jørgen Berge, Øystein Varpe, Stig Falk-Petersen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 28% |
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,241
of 3,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,992
of 172,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.