↓ Skip to main content

Face-specific capacity limits under perceptual load do not depend on holistic processing

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Face-specific capacity limits under perceptual load do not depend on holistic processing
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0633-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Volker Thoma

Abstract

Previous observations that face recognition may proceed automatically, without drawing on attentional resources, have been challenged by recent demonstrations that only a few faces can be processed at one time. However, a question remains about the nature of the stimulus properties that underlie face-specific capacity limits. Two experiments showed that speeded categorization of a famous face (such as a politician or pop star) is facilitated when it is congruent with a peripheral distractor face. This congruency effect is eliminated if the visual search is loaded with more than one face, unlike previous demonstrations of speeded classification using semantic information. Importantly, congruency effects are also eliminated when the search task is loaded with nontarget faces that are shown in an inverted orientation. These results indicate that face-specific capacity limits are not determined by the configural ("holistic") properties of face recognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cyprus 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 42%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 79%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%