↓ Skip to main content

Developing a Sustainability Credit Score System

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Developing a Sustainability Credit Score System
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-2034-2
Authors

Rodrigo Zeidan, Claudio Boechat, Angela Fleury

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 231 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 19%
Student > Master 43 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 56 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 89 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37 16%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Engineering 10 4%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 57 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,550
of 2,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,648
of 304,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.