↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Management of Persistent Strictures After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic Management of Persistent Strictures After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Published in
Obesity Surgery, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11695-013-0993-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramon Vilallonga, Jacques Himpens, Simon van de Vrande

Abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a common option in the management of morbid obesity. Although this procedure seems easier, many caveats remain, especially in terms of leakage. Other serious complications include strictures, bleeding, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Strictures are related to operative technique but also to healed leaks and fistulas. To our knowledge, the literature reports on the physiopathology and management of strictures after LSG are scarce.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Other 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,062
of 3,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,442
of 195,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.