You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Use of PAT and Off-line Methods for Monitoring of Roller Compacted Ribbon and Granule Properties with a View to Continuous Processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Organic Process Research & Development, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1021/op5000013 |
| Authors |
M. A. P. McAuliffe, G. E. O’Mahony, C. A. Blackshields, J. A. Collins, D. P. Egan, L. Kiernan, E. O’Neill, S. Lenihan, G. M. Walker, A. M. Crean |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 23% |
| Engineering | 10 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Organic Process Research & Development
#2,193
of 2,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,480
of 226,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Organic Process Research & Development
#20
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.