You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens’ juries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005437 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul A Scuffham, Julie Ratcliffe, Elizabeth Kendall, Paul Burton, Andrew Wilson, Kalipso Chalkidou, Peter Littlejohns, Jennifer A Whitty |
| Abstract |
The optimal approach to engage the public in healthcare decision-making is unclear. Approaches range from deliberative citizens' juries to large population surveys using discrete choice experiments. This study promotes public engagement and quantifies preferences in two key areas of relevance to the industry partners to identify which approach is most informative for informing healthcare policy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#21,929
of 25,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,345
of 242,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#230
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.