↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Diabetes Interventions in the Patient-Centered Medical Home

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of Diabetes Interventions in the Patient-Centered Medical Home
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11892-013-0471-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A. Ackroyd, Deborah J. Wexler

Abstract

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is an innovative care model for the provision of primary care that is being rapidly adopted in the U.S. with the support of federal agencies and professional organizations. Its goal is to provide comprehensive, patient-centered care with increased access, quality, and efficiency. Diabetes, as a common, costly, chronic disease that requires ongoing management by patients and providers, is a condition that is frequently monitored as a test case in PCMH implementations. While in theory a PCMH care model that supports patient engagement and between-visit care may help improve diabetes care delivery and outcomes, the success of this approach may depend largely upon the specific strategies used and implementation approach. The cost-effectiveness of diabetes care in the PCMH model is not yet clear. Interventions have been most effective and most cost-effective for those with the poorest diabetes management at baseline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,597,253
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#129
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,310
of 307,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.