↓ Skip to main content

Development of goal-directed action selection guided by intrinsic motivations: an experiment with children

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Development of goal-directed action selection guided by intrinsic motivations: an experiment with children
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00221-014-3907-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrizio Taffoni, Eleonora Tamilia, Valentina Focaroli, Domenico Formica, Luca Ricci, Giovanni Di Pino, Gianluca Baldassarre, Marco Mirolli, Eugenio Guglielmelli, Flavio Keller

Abstract

Action selection is extremely important, particularly when the accomplishment of competitive tasks may require access to limited motor resources. The spontaneous exploration of the world plays a fundamental role in the development of this capacity, providing subjects with an increasingly diverse set of opportunities to acquire, practice and refine the understanding of action-outcome connection. The computational modeling literature proposed a number of specific mechanisms for autonomous agents to discover and target interesting outcomes: intrinsic motivations hold a central importance among those mechanisms. Unfortunately, the study of the acquisition of action-outcome relation was mostly carried out with experiments involving extrinsic tasks, either based on rewards or on predefined task goals. This work presents a new experimental paradigm to study the effect of intrinsic motivation on action-outcome relation learning and action selection during free exploration of the world. Three- and four-year-old children were observed during the free exploration of a new toy: half of them were allowed to develop the knowledge concerning its functioning; the other half were not allowed to learn anything. The knowledge acquired during the free exploration of the toy was subsequently assessed and compared.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 30%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,006
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,662
of 225,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#29
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.