↓ Skip to main content

Sources of variance in a female fertility signal: exaggerated estrous swellings in a natural population of baboons

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Sources of variance in a female fertility signal: exaggerated estrous swellings in a natural population of baboons
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00265-014-1722-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Courtney L. Fitzpatrick, Jeanne Altmann, Susan C. Alberts

Abstract

Signals of fertility in female animals are of increasing interest to evolutionary biologists, a development that coincides with increasing interest in male mate choice and the potential for female traits to evolve under sexual selection. We characterized variation in size of an exaggerated female fertility signal in baboons and investigated the sources of that variance. The number of sexual cycles that a female had experienced after her most recent pregnancy ("cycles since resumption") was the strongest predictor of swelling size. Furthermore, the relationship between cycles since resumption and swelling size was most evident during rainy periods and was not evident during times of drought. Finally, we found significant differences in swelling size between individual females; these differences endured across cycles (i.e., were not explained by variation within individuals) and persisted in spite of ecological effects. This study is the first to provide conclusive evidence of significant variation in swelling size between female primates (controlling for cycles since resumption) and to demonstrate that ecological constraints influence variation in this signal of fertility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 54%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,478,735
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,116
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,813
of 229,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.