| Title |
The ladies trial: laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or resection for purulent peritonitisA and Hartmann's procedure or resection with primary anastomosis for purulent or faecal peritonitisB in perforated diverticulitis (NTR2037)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Surgery, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2482-10-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hilko A Swank, Jefrey Vermeulen, Johan F Lange, Irene M Mulder, Joost AB van der Hoeven, Laurents PS Stassen, Rogier MPH Crolla, Meindert N Sosef, Simon W Nienhuijs, Robbert JI Bosker, Maarten J Boom, Philip M Kruyt, Dingeman J Swank, Willem H Steup, Eelco JR de Graaf, Wibo F Weidema, Robert EGJM Pierik, Hubert A Prins, Hein BAC Stockmann, Rob AEM Tollenaar, Bart A van Wagensveld, Peter-Paul LO Coene, Gerrit D Slooter, Esther CJ Consten, Eino B van Duijn, Michael F Gerhards, Anton GM Hoofwijk, Thomas M Karsten, Peter A Neijenhuis, Charlotte FJM Blanken-Peeters, Huib A Cense, Guido HH Mannaerts, Sjoerd C Bruin, Quirijn AJ Eijsbouts, Marinus J Wiezer, Eric J Hazebroek, Anna AW van Geloven, John K Maring, André JL D'Hoore, Alex Kartheuser, Christophe Remue, Helma MU van Grevenstein, Joop LM Konsten, Donald L van der Peet, Marc JPM Govaert, Alexander F Engel, Johannes B Reitsma, Willem A Bemelman, Dutch Diverticular Disease (3D) Collaborative Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Turkey | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 70% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,693,804
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#11
of 1,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,223
of 99,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them