| Title |
Micro-CT imaging of live insects using carbon dioxide gas-induced hypoxia as anesthetic with minimal impact on certain subsequent life history traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Zoology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40850-017-0018-x |
| Authors |
Danny Poinapen, Joanna K. Konopka, Joseph U. Umoh, Chris J. D. Norley, Jeremy N. McNeil, David W. Holdsworth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 158 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 15% |
| Japan | 15 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 8% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 123 | 78% |
| Scientists | 26 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 52% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#154,120
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from BMC Zoology
#4
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,250
of 328,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Zoology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them