Title |
The impact of meal timing on performance, sleepiness, gastric upset, and hunger during simulated night shift
|
---|---|
Published in |
Industrial Health, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0047 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Crystal Leigh GRANT, Jillian DORRIAN, Alison Maree COATES, Maja PAJCIN, David John KENNAWAY, Gary Allen WITTERT, Leonie Kaye HEILBRONN, Chris DELLA VEDOVA, Charlotte Cecilia GUPTA, Siobhan BANKS |
Abstract |
This study examined the impact of eating during simulated night shift on performance and subjective complaints. Subjects were randomized to eating at night (n=5; 23.2±5.5y) or not eating at night (n=5; 26.2±6.4y). All participants were given one sleep opportunity of 8h (22:00h-06:00h) before transitioning to the night shift protocol. During the four days of simulated night shift participants were awake from 16:00h-10:00h with a daytime sleep of 6h (10:00h-16:00h). In the simulated night shift protocol, meals were provided at ≈0700h, 1900h and 0130h (eating at night); or ≈0700h, 0930h, 1410h and 1900h (not eating at night). Subjects completed sleepiness, hunger and gastric complaint scales, a Digit Symbol Substitution Task and a 10-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task. Increased sleepiness and performance impairment was evident in both conditions at 0400h (p<0.05). Performance impairment at 0400h was exacerbated when eating at night. Not eating at night was associated with elevated hunger and a small but significant elevation in stomach upset across the night (p<0.026). Eating at night was associated with elevated bloating on night one, which decreased across the protocol. Restricting food intake may limit performance impairments at night. Dietary recommendations to improve night-shift performance must also consider worker comfort. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 57% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 15 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 7% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 19% |
Unknown | 35 | 35% |