↓ Skip to main content

Detection of a genetic footprint of the sofosbuvir resistance-associated substitution S282T after HCV treatment failure

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Detection of a genetic footprint of the sofosbuvir resistance-associated substitution S282T after HCV treatment failure
Published in
Virology Journal, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12985-017-0779-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Walker, Sandra Filke, Nadine Lübke, Martin Obermeier, Rolf Kaiser, Dieter Häussinger, Jörg Timm, Hans H. Bock

Abstract

The major resistance-associated substitution for sofosbuvir (S282T) in HCV NS5B causes severe viral fitness costs and rapidly reverts back to prototype in the absence of selection pressure. Accordingly, resistance against sofosbuvir is rarely detected even in patients after treatment failure. We report a case of a GT3a infected patient with viral breakthrough under SOF/DCV therapy. At the time of breakthrough the RAS S282T was predominant in NS5B and then rapidly disappeared during follow-up by week 12 after treatment. Interestingly, despite only serine was encoded in position 282 during follow-up, two distinct genetic pathways for reversion were detectable. In 31% of the quasispecies the original codon for serine was present whereas in the majority of the quasispecies an alternative codon was selected. This alternative codon usage was unique for all GT3a isolates from the HCV database and remained detectable as a genetic footprint for prior resistance selection at the RNA level for at least 6 months. Comparative analyses of viral sequences at the codon level before and after DAA treatment may help to elucidate the patient's history of resistance selection, which is particularly valuable for highly unfit substitutions that are detectable only for a short period of time. If such codon changes increase the risk of re-selection of resistance upon a second exposure to SOF remains to be addressed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,566,650
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#2,452
of 3,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,014
of 317,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#33
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.