↓ Skip to main content

Impact of receptor phenotype on nodal burden in patients with breast cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in BJS Open , July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of receptor phenotype on nodal burden in patients with breast cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Published in
BJS Open , July 2017
DOI 10.1002/bjs5.6
Pubmed ID
Authors

M R Boland, T P McVeigh, N O'Flaherty, G Gullo, M Keane, C M Quinn, E W McDermott, A J Lowery, M J Kerin, R S Prichard

Abstract

Optimal evaluation and management of the axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with node-positive breast cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of receptor phenotype in patients with nodal metastases who undergo NAC to see whether this approach can identify those who may be suitable for conservative axillary management. Between 2009 and 2014, all patients with breast cancer and biopsy-proven nodal disease who received NAC were identified from prospectively developed databases. Details of patients who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) following NAC were recorded and rates of pathological complete response (pCR) were evaluated for receptor phenotype. Some 284 patients with primary breast cancer and nodal metastases underwent NAC and subsequent ALND, including two with bilateral disease. The most common receptor phenotype was luminal A (154 of 286 tumours, 53·8 per cent), with lesser proportions accounted for by the luminal B-Her2 type (64, 22·4 per cent), Her2-overexpressing (38, 13·3 per cent) and basal-like, triple-negative (30, 10·5 per cent) subtypes. Overall pCR rates in the breast and axilla were 19·9 per cent (54 of 271 tumours) and 37·4 per cent (105 of 281) respectively. Axillary pCR rates were highest in the Her2-overexpressing group (27 of 35, 77 per cent) and lowest in the luminal A group (35 of 153, 22·9 per cent) (P < 0·001). Nodal burden (median number of positive nodes excised) was lower in the Her2-overexpressing group compared with the luminal A group (0 versus 3; P < 0·001). Her2 positivity was associated with increased rates of axillary pCR and reduced nodal burden following NAC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 2 22%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,303,959
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BJS Open
#528
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,935
of 326,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJS Open
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.