↓ Skip to main content

Neglected endemic mycoses

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neglected endemic mycoses
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30306-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavio Queiroz-Telles, Ahmed Hassan Fahal, Diego R Falci, Diego H Caceres, Tom Chiller, Alessandro C Pasqualotto

Abstract

Fungi often infect mammalian hosts via the respiratory route, but traumatic transcutaneous implantation is also an important source of infections. Environmental exposure to spores of pathogenic fungi can result in subclinical and unrecognised syndromes, allergic manifestations, and even overt disease. After traumatic cutaneous inoculation, several fungi can cause neglected mycoses such as sporotrichosis, chromoblastomycosis, mycetoma, entomophthoramycosis, and lacaziosis. Most of these diseases have a subacute to chronic course and they can become recalcitrant to therapy and lead to physical disabilities, including inability to work, physical deformities, and amputations. For many years, paracoccidioidomycosis was considered the most prevalent endemic systemic mycosis in the Americas, but this situation might be changing with recognition of the worldwide presence of Histoplasma capsulatum. Both paracoccidioidomycosis and histoplasmosis can mimic several infectious and non-infectious medical conditions and lead to death if not recognised early and treated. Cutaneous implantation and systemic mycoses are neglected diseases that affect millions of individuals worldwide, especially in low-income countries where their management is suboptimum because challenges in diagnosis and therapeutic options are substantial issues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 371 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 14%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Postgraduate 36 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 99 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 45 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 6%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 106 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#3,173
of 6,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,439
of 330,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#64
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.