↓ Skip to main content

Parental Outcomes Following Participation in Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Parental Outcomes Following Participation in Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3224-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea L. Maughan, Jonathan A. Weiss

Abstract

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) benefit from parent involvement in their therapy, and there is evidence that this involvement may improve parent functioning as well. We examined changes in parent mental health, parenting, and expressed emotion, following participation in a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy for 57 children with ASD. Post-intervention, improvements occurred in the treatment group in parent depression and emotion regulation, compared to waitlisted parents. Treatment effects also occurred across all parents in depression, emotion regulation, perceptions of their children and mindful parenting. Though preliminary, these results have implications for intervention development and evaluation by focusing on parent outcomes in child treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Researcher 18 7%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 79 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 34%
Social Sciences 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 95 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#291,716
of 25,121,016 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#76
of 5,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,329
of 322,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.