↓ Skip to main content

Saposhnikoviae divaricata: a phytochemical, pharmacological, and pharmacokinetic review

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 540)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saposhnikoviae divaricata: a phytochemical, pharmacological, and pharmacokinetic review
Published in
Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/s1875-5364(17)30042-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny Kreiner, Edwin Pang, George Binh Lenon, Angela Wei Hong Yang

Abstract

Saposhnikoviae divaricata (Turcz.) Schischk (SD) is a traditional Chinese herb commonly used to treat clinical conditions such as rheumatism and allergic rhinitis. This review article evaluates a collection of works on in vitro and biochemical studies of SD. The discourse on the diverse class of chromones and coumarins in SD offers an insight to the pharmacological effects of these bioactive constituents as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, immunoregulatory, antioxidative, and anti-proliferative agents. It is highlighted that there is a structural relationship between the constituents and bioactive activities, which in effect provides a valid reasoning and reaffirm the use of SD in the treatment of the pathologies in Chinese medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,968,106
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
#48
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,593
of 327,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.