↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of long term performance between alkali activated slag and fly ash geopolymer concretes

Overview of attention for article published in Construction & Building Materials, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of long term performance between alkali activated slag and fly ash geopolymer concretes
Published in
Construction & Building Materials, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.153
Authors

Arie Wardhono, Chamila Gunasekara, David W. Law, Sujeeva Setunge

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 251 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 78 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 112 45%
Materials Science 14 6%
Energy 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 106 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Construction & Building Materials
#1,637
of 2,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,092
of 326,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Construction & Building Materials
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.