| Title |
Predictors that Influence Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Election Among Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Who Were Evaluated for BRCA Genetic Testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3747-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nisreen Elsayegh, Henry M. Kuerer, Heather Lin, Angelica M. Gutierrez Barrera, Michelle Jackson, Kimberly I. Muse, Jennifer K. Litton, Constance Albarracin, Aimaz Afrough, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Banu K. Arun |
| Abstract |
Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are at increased risk for developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Consequently, more women with DCIS are electing to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). We evaluated factors associated with CPM in patients with DCIS who underwent genetic counseling for BRCA testing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 46% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,968
of 6,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,230
of 227,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#54
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.