↓ Skip to main content

Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Recommendations for Diagnostics and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Recommendations for Diagnostics and Treatment
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-5993-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Urs Dietmar Achim Müller-Richter, Anja Gesierich, Alexander Christian Kübler, Stefan Hartmann, Roman Camillus Brands

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive tumor that often occurs in the head and neck region. Because of these features, the classifications and diagnostic and treatment regimens are frequently modified. Especially in the anatomically complex head and neck region, it is crucial to be aware of the current recommendations for diagnostics and treatment of MCC to ensure appropriate treatment. This overview aims to summarize the currently available literature. The authors reviewed the relevant literature and international guidelines for MCC from 2012 to 2017 with respect to epidemiology and prognosis, diagnostic procedures and imaging, surgery, radiation, systemic treatment, and aftercare. These results were compared with existing guidelines, some of them current, and recommendations were derived. Marked developments in imaging have resulted in an increased use of functional imaging. The surgical concepts have changed regarding safety margins and the use of sentinel node biopsies. In systemic treatment, a move from conventional agents toward immuno-oncology can be observed. For staging, it is important to be as exact as possible using functional imaging (e.g., positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan), especially in the head and neck area with its complex lymph drainage. This often plays an especially important role in early stages of the tumor, when the resection margin can be reduced to preserve the organ. Aftercare also should include functional imaging. In an advanced, metastatic stage, immuno-oncology (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4) is superior to the previous methods of systemic treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,583,873
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,804
of 6,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,867
of 316,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#49
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.