↓ Skip to main content

The Association between Peritoneal Dialysis Modality and Peritonitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Association between Peritoneal Dialysis Modality and Peritonitis
Published in
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, March 2014
DOI 10.2215/cjn.09730913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick G. Lan, David W. Johnson, Stephen P. McDonald, Neil Boudville, Monique Borlace, Sunil V. Badve, Kamal Sud, Philip A. Clayton

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence comparing peritonitis rates among patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). This study aims to clarify the relationship between peritoneal dialysis (PD) modality (APD versus CAPD) and the risk of developing PD-associated peritonitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Master 10 16%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#3,544
of 4,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,464
of 235,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#39
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.