↓ Skip to main content

Family-centered Services for Children with ASD and Limited Speech: The Experiences of Parents and Speech-language Pathologists

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Family-centered Services for Children with ASD and Limited Speech: The Experiences of Parents and Speech-language Pathologists
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3241-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey Mandak, Janice Light

Abstract

Although family-centered services have long been discussed as essential in providing successful services to families of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), ideal implementation is often lacking. This study aimed to increase understanding of how families with children with ASD and limited speech receive services from speech-language pathologists (SLPs). 99 parents of children with ASD and limited speech and 211 SLPs who served children with ASD and limited speech completed questionnaires measuring their experiences with the provision of family-centered services. Findings revealed that parents and SLPs differed in their views on the degree to which family-centered services were being implemented. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed in order to promote continued growth in the acquisition of family-centered skills.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 52 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Psychology 28 16%
Social Sciences 20 11%
Unspecified 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 62 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,983,363
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,658
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,463
of 319,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#39
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.