↓ Skip to main content

Clinical outcomes and survival in pediatric patients initiating chronic dialysis: a report of the NAPRTCS registry

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Clinical outcomes and survival in pediatric patients initiating chronic dialysis: a report of the NAPRTCS registry
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00467-017-3759-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald J. Weaver, Michael J. G. Somers, Karen Martz, Mark M. Mitsnefes

Abstract

The 2011 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) registry comprises data on 6482 dialysis patients over the past 20 years of the registry. The study compared clinical parameters and patient survival in the first 10 years of the registry (1992-2001) with the last decade of the registry (2002-2011). There was a significant increase in hemodialysis as the initiating dialysis modality in the most recent cohort (42% vs. 36%, p < 0.001). Patients in the later cohort were less likely to have a hemoglobin <10 g/dl [odds ratio (OR) 0.68; confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.81; p < 0.001] and height z-score <2 standard deviations (SD) below average (OR 0.68, CI 0.59-0.78, p < 0.0001). They were also more likely to have a parathyroid hormone (PTH) level two times above the upper limits of normal (OR 1.39, CI 1.21-1.60, p < 0.0001). Although hypertension was common regardless of era, patients in the 2002-2011 group were less likely to have blood pressure >90th percentile (OR 1.39, CI 1.21-1.60, p < 0.0001), and a significant improvement in survival at 36 months after dialysis initiation was observed in the 2002-2011 cohort compared with the 1992-2001 cohort (95% vs. 90%, respectively). Cardiopulmonary causes were the most common cause of death in both cohorts. Young age, growth deficit, and black race were poor predictors of survival. The survival of pediatric patients on chronic dialysis has improved over two decades of dialysis registry data, specifically for children <1year.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,369,637
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#921
of 4,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,733
of 329,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#19
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.