↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic lethality in malignant pleural mesothelioma with PARP1 inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Synthetic lethality in malignant pleural mesothelioma with PARP1 inhibition
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3401-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gayathri Srinivasan, Gurjit Singh Sidhu, Elizabeth A. Williamson, Aruna S. Jaiswal, Nasreen Najmunnisa, Keith Wilcoxen, Dennie Jones, Thomas J. George, Robert Hromas

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPM) are most often surgically unresectable, and they respond poorly to current chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Between 23 and 64% of malignant pleural mesothelioma have somatic inactivating mutations in the BAP1 gene. BAP1 is a homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair component found in the BRCA1/BARD1 complex. Similar to BRCA1/2 deficient cancers, mutation in the BAP1 gene leads to a deficient HR pathway and increases the reliance on other DNA repair pathways. We hypothesized that BAP1-mutant MPM would require PARP1 for survival, similar to the BRCA1/2 mutant breast and ovarian cancers. Therefore, we used the clinical PARP1 inhibitors niraparib and olaparib to assess whether they could induce synthetic lethality in MPM. Surprisingly, we found that all MPM cell lines examined, regardless of BAP1 status, were addicted to PARP1-mediated DNA repair for survival. We found that niraparib and olaparib exposure markedly decreased clonal survival in multiple MPM cell lines, with and without BAP1 mutations. This clonal cell death may be due to the extensive replication fork collapse and genomic instability that PARP1 inhibition induces in MPM cells. The requirement of MPM cells for PARP1 suggests that they may generally arise from defects in HR DNA repair. More importantly, these data demonstrate that the PARP1 inhibitors could be effective in the treatment of MPM, for which little effective therapy exists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,550,468
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#1,988
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,178
of 317,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.