↓ Skip to main content

Amphipols in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Pharmacology: What Are They Good For?

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Amphipols in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Pharmacology: What Are They Good For?
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00232-014-9665-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Mary, Marjorie Damian, Rita Rahmeh, Bernard Mouillac, Jacky Marie, Sébastien Granier, Jean-Louis Banères

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors are at a central node of all cell communications. Investigating their molecular functioning is therefore crucial for both academic purposes and drug design. However, getting the receptors as isolated, stable and purified proteins for such studies still stumbles over their instability out of the membrane environment. Different membrane-mimicking environments have been developed so far to increase the stability of purified receptors. Among them are amphipols. These polymers not only preserve the native fold of receptors purified from membrane fractions but they also allow specific applications such as folding receptors purified from inclusion bodies back to their native state. Of importance, amphipol-trapped G protein-coupled receptors essentially maintain their pharmacological properties so that they are perfectly adapted to further investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying signaling processes. We review here how amphipols have been used to refold and stabilize detergent-solubilized purified receptors and what are the main subsequent molecular pharmacology analyses that were performed using this strategy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 30%
Chemistry 6 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unknown 4 11%