↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of molecular breeding values for Warner-Bratzler shear force and carcass traits of beef cattle – An independent validation study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of molecular breeding values for Warner-Bratzler shear force and carcass traits of beef cattle – An independent validation study
Published in
Journal of Animal Science, May 2014
DOI 10.2527/jas.2013-7374
Pubmed ID
Authors

E C Akanno, G Plastow, B W Woodward, S Bauck, H Okut, X-L Wu, C Sun, J L Aalhus, S S Moore, S P Miller, Z Wang, J A Basarab

Abstract

Interest in genetic improvement of carcass and tenderness traits of beef cattle using genome-based selection (GS) and marker-assisted management programs is increasing. The success of such a program depends on the presence of linkage disequilibrium between the observed markers and the underlying QTLs as well as on the relationship between the discovery, validation and target populations. For molecular breeding values (MBVs) predicted for a target population using SNP markers, reliabilities of these MBVs can be obtained from validation analyses conducted in an independent population distinct from the discovery set. The objective of this study was to test MBVs predicted for carcass and tenderness traits of beef cattle in a Canadian-based validation population that is largely independent of a US-based discovery set. The discovery dataset comprised of genotypes and phenotypes from > 2,900 multi-breed beef cattle while the validation population consisted of 802 crossbred feeder heifers and steers. A bivariate animal model that fitted actual phenotype and MBV was utilised for validation analyses. The reliability of MBVs was defined as square of the genetic correlation (R(2)g) that represents the proportion of the additive genetic variance explained by the SNP markers. Several scenarios involving different starting marker panels (384, 3K, 7K and 50K) and different sets of SNPs selected to compute MBVs (50, 100, 200, 375, 400, 600 and 800) were investigated. Validation results showed that the most reliable MBV (R(2)g) were 0.34 for HCW, 0.36 for back fat thickness, 0.28 for rib eye area, 0.30 for marbling score, 0.25 for yield grade and 0.38 for Warner-Bratzler shear force across the different scenarios explored. The results indicate that smaller SNP panels can be developed for use in genetic improvement of beef carcass and tenderness traits in order to exploit GS benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 53%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science
#4,958
of 5,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,440
of 241,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.