You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodological considerations regarding online extraction of water from soils for stable isotope determination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rcm.7948 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brynne E. Lazarus, Matthew J. Germino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| China | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,601,419
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#403
of 4,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,982
of 319,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#7
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.