↓ Skip to main content

Management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding after colorectal resection and stapled anastomosis

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding after colorectal resection and stapled anastomosis
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10151-009-0458-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria-Angeles Martínez-Serrano, David Parés, Miguel Pera, Marta Pascual, Ricard Courtier, Maria Jose Gil Egea, Luis Grande

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 14 26%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 57%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 20 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,537,059
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#703
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,544
of 95,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them