| Title |
Prospective Study Comparing Multi‐Detector Row CT and Endoscopy in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-009-0156-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabrizio M. Frattaroli, Emanuele Casciani, Domenico Spoletini, Elisabetta Polettini, Aldo Nunziale, Luca Bertini, Annarita Vestri, Gianfranco Gualdi, Giuseppe Pappalardo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,537,059
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,516
of 4,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,566
of 111,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.