↓ Skip to main content

日本全国におけるシマヘビの色彩変異

Overview of attention for article published in BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本全国におけるシマヘビの色彩変異
Published in
BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, March 2005
DOI 10.14880/hrghsj1999.2005.22
Authors

森 哲, 田中 幸治, 森口 一, 長谷川 雅美

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,854,962
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#7
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,240
of 76,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.