| Title |
A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-017-0392-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fran Toye, Kate Seers, Erin Hannink, Karen Barker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 25% |
| United States | 9 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 58% |
| Scientists | 15 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#920,140
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#80
of 2,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,623
of 328,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.