↓ Skip to main content

Barriers to breastfeeding in Lebanon: A policy analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Barriers to breastfeeding in Lebanon: A policy analysis
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, May 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41271-017-0077-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaza Akik, Hala Ghattas, Suzanne Filteau, Cecile Knai

Abstract

Although the issue of breastfeeding in Lebanon has risen on the political agenda, the country does not meet international recommendations for early breastfeeding practices. This study analysed barriers to dissemination, implementation, and enforcement of key policies to improve early breastfeeding practices. We conducted interviews with stakeholders in breastfeeding policy in Lebanon and used a framework approach for analysing data. We found a disconnect between policy endorsement and translation on the ground, weak engagement of professional associations and governmental institutions, undue influence by the breast milk substitute industry, and competing priorities-most notably the current refugee crisis. This study highlights the potential policy opportunities to counter these barriers and points to the role of international organisations and grassroots advocacy in pushing, monitoring, and implementing policies that protect breastfeeding, where government capacity is limited, and the private sector is strong.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2018.
All research outputs
#12,756,285
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#576
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,339
of 309,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.