↓ Skip to main content

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of anti-transcriptional intermediary factor-1 gamma and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies in dermatomyositis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Dermatological Science, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of anti-transcriptional intermediary factor-1 gamma and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies in dermatomyositis
Published in
Journal of Dermatological Science, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.09.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manabu Fujimoto, Akihiro Murakami, Shunsuke Kurei, Naoko Okiyama, Atsushi Kawakami, Michiaki Mishima, Shinji Sato, Mariko Seishima, Takafumi Suda, Tsuneyo Mimori, Kazuhiko Takehara, Masataka Kuwana

Abstract

Autoantibodies against transcriptional intermediary factor 1 (TIF1) and Mi-2 are selectively detected in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). To measure these antibodies readily, the development of reliable ELISA systems has been needed. This study aimed to establish enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for anti-TIF1γ and anti-Mi-2β antibodies (Abs) and to assess their utility. Serum samples were obtained from 104 patients with classic DM, 68 with clinically amyopathic DM (CADM) and 70 with polymyositis, who were followed up at 8 medical centers across Japan. Serum samples from 190 patients with other connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and 123 healthy individuals were also assessed. Serum antibody levels were examined by ELISAs coated with full-length TIF1γ or Mi-2β proteins produced by a baculovirus expression system. To assess the cross-reactivity, partial-length Mi-2β proteins with or without mutations were produced and examined for reactivity. When compared with immunoprecipitation assay, anti-TIF1γ Ab ELISA showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while anti-Mi-2β Ab ELISA showed 100% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity. Anti-TIF1γ Ab was positive in 30 (28.8%) with classic DM and 4 (5.9%) with CADM, whereas 14 (13.5%) with classic DM, but none with CADM, were positive for anti-Mi-2β Ab. Of 30 anti-TIF1γ Ab-positive DM patients, 23 (67.6%) had malignancy. Anti-Mi-2β Ab-positive serum samples exhibited modest cross-reactivity with the TIF1γ protein due to the homologous amino acid sequence containing cysteines in their plant homeodomains. The current study demonstrates the utility of newly established ELISAs for anti-TIF1γ and anti-Mi-2β Abs, which can serve as easier detection systems for routine testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Computer Science 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 11 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dermatological Science
#762
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,401
of 329,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dermatological Science
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.