↓ Skip to main content

5.雲母肺の1例(第96回日本気管支学会関東支部会)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
5.雲母肺の1例(第96回日本気管支学会関東支部会)
Published in
The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy, July 2001
DOI 10.18907/jjsre.23.5_495_5
Authors

小原 一葉, 小林 英夫, 斎藤 渉, 新海 正晴, 車川 寿一, 叶 宗一郎, 元吉 和夫, 相田 真介, 尾関 雄一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,588,625
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
#10
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,237
of 40,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them