| Title |
Systematic review of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of non-neurological soft tissue radiation-related injuries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-014-2198-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin L. Hoggan, Alun L. Cameron |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this paper was to provide an evidence-based evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for the treatment of non-neurological soft tissue radiation-related injuries (STRI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 51 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,199,877
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,774
of 4,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,738
of 225,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#26
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.