You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Positive and negative intergroup contact predict Black and White Americans' judgments about police violence against Black Americans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jasp.12463 |
| Authors |
Lydia E. Hayward, Matthew J. Hornsey, Linda R. Tropp, Fiona Kate Barlow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 53% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,536,576
of 25,000,733 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Social Psychology
#356
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,376
of 322,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Social Psychology
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,000,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.