↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and risk factors of diabetes in a large community-based study in North India: results from a STEPS survey in Punjab, India

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence and risk factors of diabetes in a large community-based study in North India: results from a STEPS survey in Punjab, India
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13098-017-0207-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaya Prasad Tripathy, J. S. Thakur, Gursimer Jeet, Sohan Chawla, Sanjay Jain, Arnab Pal, Rajendra Prasad, Rajiv Saran

Abstract

India is the diabetes capital with home to 69.1 million people with DM, the second highest number of cases after China. Recent epidemiological evidence indicates a rising DM epidemic across all classes, both affluent and the poor in India. This article reports on the prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in the North Indian state of Punjab as part of a large household NCD Risk Factor Survey. A household NCD STEPS survey was done in the state of Punjab, India in a multistage stratified sample of 5127 individuals. All the subjects were administered the WHO STEPS questionnaire, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements. Every alternate respondent in the sample (n = 2499) was assayed for blood parameters. Overall prevalence of DM among the study participants was found out to be 8.3% (95% CI 7.3-9.4%) whereas prevalence of prediabetes was 6.3% (5.4-7.3%). Age group (45-69 years), marital status, hypertension, obesity and family history of DM were found to be the risk factors significantly associated with DM. Out of all persons with DM, only 18% were known case of DM or on treatment, among whom only about one-third had controlled blood glucose status. The study reported high prevalence of diabetes, especially of undiagnosed cases amongst the adult population, most of whom have uncontrolled blood sugar levels. This indicates the need for systematic screening and awareness program to identify the undiagnosed cases in the community and offer early treatment and regular follow up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 382 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 12%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Postgraduate 41 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 130 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 11%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 144 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#19,072,560
of 24,287,697 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#489
of 742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,455
of 426,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.