↓ Skip to main content

When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1356-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth R. Schotter, Mallorie Leinenger, Titus von der Malsburg

Abstract

The phenomenon of forced fixations suggests that readers sometimes fixate a word (due to oculomotor constraints) even though they intended to skip it (due to parafoveal cognitive-linguistic processing). We investigate whether this leads readers to look directly at a word but not pay attention to it. We used a gaze-contingent boundary paradigm to dissociate parafoveal and foveal information (e.g., the word phone changed to scarf once the reader's eyes moved to it) and asked questions about the sentence to determine which one the reader encoded. When the word was skipped or fixated only briefly (i.e., up to 100 ms) readers were more likely to report reading the parafoveal than the fixated word, suggesting that there are cases in which readers look directly at a word but their minds ignore it, leading to the illusion of reading something they did not fixate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 28%
Linguistics 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 22%