↓ Skip to main content

Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
72 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
Title
Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00421-017-3690-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott J. Dankel, Kevin T. Mattocks, Matthew B. Jessee, Samuel L. Buckner, J. Grant Mouser, Jeremy P. Loenneke

Abstract

Many reviews conclude that metabolites play an important role with respect to muscle hypertrophy during resistance exercise, but their actual physiologic contribution remains unknown. Some have suggested that metabolites may work independently of muscle contraction, while others have suggested that metabolites may play a secondary role in their ability to augment muscle activation via inducing fatigue. Interestingly, the studies used as support for an anabolic role of metabolites use protocols that are not actually designed to test the importance of metabolites independent of muscle contraction. While there is some evidence in vitro that metabolites may induce muscle hypertrophy, the only study attempting to answer this question in humans found no added benefit of pooling metabolites within the muscle post-exercise. As load-induced muscle hypertrophy is thought to work via mechanotransduction (as opposed to being metabolically driven), it seems likely that metabolites simply augment muscle activation and cause the mechanotransduction cascade in a larger proportion of muscle fibers, thereby producing greater muscle growth. A sufficient time under tension also appears necessary, as measurable muscle growth is not observed after repeated maximal testing. Based on current evidence, it is our opinion that metabolites produced during resistance exercise do not have anabolic properties per se, but may be anabolic in their ability to augment muscle activation. Future studies are needed to compare protocols which produce similar levels of muscle activation, but differ in the magnitude of metabolites produced, or duration in which the exercised muscles are exposed to metabolites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 288 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 22%
Student > Bachelor 46 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Researcher 19 7%
Professor 13 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 75 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 106 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 91 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,017,049
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#307
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,607
of 327,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.